Monday, May 27, 2013

How to win in court...

Dean Clifford, Menard, Bonacci and others are discovering how to win in court. Type their names into youtube.

I was saddled with two ten-year-long lawsuits. The lawyers and Judges drag these things out because they are making money off you. I wound up spending over $250,000 in legal fees for nothing. You only have forty years of useful productive life from age 25 to 65. After that, for the most part you are too old and disabled to start over building a retirement. Before age 25 you usually don’t know what to do with the rest of your life and you lack education. Two of these ten-year-long lawsuits will take half of your useful productive life away and there is nothing more wasteful. It wasn’t until I fired my lawyers that I started winning. Now that I understand how these very destructive type of lawsuits work they will never bother me again. The only problem now is that I am 69 years old and have wasted most of my life fighting bogus lawsuits before I got wise. Here is what you must do:    

When you go into court and you are asked to state your name, say:
I am the Executor and Beneficiary of the last will and testament of God.
What is your standing here?
Are you the Trustee?
What is your claim?
Who are you?         
What is your name?
I am administrating here. (You have to establish what roles the various people are playing in the courtroom. Once you have that established you are free to go.)

All courts use corporate law. There has to be three officers to make a corporation.
Corporate Law is the highest law in the land. It is god’s Law. It is the Holy Trinity. The Bible is God’s Last Will and Testament. Picture a triangle with God at the top and Jesus at lower left. Then you have the Holy Ghost at lower right. In a courtroom situation the Judge is the Executor/executioner at the top. The Holy Ghost is the corporate government at the right. The Holy Ghost government and the God/Executor/executioner is all the same thing while you are the beneficiary. Everyone in the courtroom is there for one thing: to take something from you rather it be your trust/money/life savings/insurance, house, land etc. or in some cases even your, life.

All contract/corporate law operates by presumption. Practically every court in the land uses this highest form of law. They automatically turn your name into a corporate fiction with all capital letters so that the corporate/contract law will apply to your corporate fiction.

Under contract law you never want to be the trustee and you never want the Judge to be the Executor. Under contract law a person (you are a person or dead animal defined in Blacks Law) cannot hold the office of Beneficiary and Trustee or Executor and that’s exactly what is going on in the courtroom. In a courtroom the government holds two offices, the Executor/Judge and the Trustee who wants what you have. They want to take away your trust.

The Judge is not the Executor but he wants you to presume that he is. In reality, he is working for the government who is the trustee. His paycheck comes from the government but he gets a big bonus if he puts someone in jail. In most cases he also has his retirement pension invested in prison stocks therefore everyone he puts in prison benefits the company.

The government holds everything in trust for the people. So when you walk into a court room you automatically have two corporate entities trying to get something from you rather it be for you to confess to a crime you did not do or to take something from you like your house, land, inheritance, IRA, life insurance etc., etc. You are the one that owns something that the lawyers want to get.

You can nullify all that right off if you establish what rolls the people are playing in the courtroom.

When you hire a lawyer to re-present you he has previously sworn an oath to the Barr Association that supersedes any kind of commitment that he has to re-present you. Therefor you have hired someone who is automatically on the side of the government. For the most part any money you give him for a retainer to re-present you is a big waste of money unless you know the attorney is really working for you and has a good chance of winning. About 3 percent of defendants actually win a case. Your odds of actually winning a case with a lawyer are quite small.

You then have a very small chance to contest this by asking the question: “Can I be bound to a contract when my lawyer has a superseding oath?” You can say: “He didn’t provide full disclosure and my lawyer allowed the trial to go forward with the “Presumption” that the Judge is both the Administrator and Executor (executioner).

Before you have been suckered into one of these contract courtrooms you definitely must establish a CLAIM OF RIGHT. Simply ask in writing: “Please provide proof of claim for something that you are alleging that I cannot do.” State: “My rights have a fee attached. My offers are non-negotiable. Violating any of my God given rights is a fee of ten-million dollars. You got 21 days to respond.

“Send me some facts or evidence of something I cannot do!”   

Say: “I plead guilty to the facts.” If you really want to piss off the Judge ask: “Are you a bureaucrat?” “Are you a public employee?”

All bureaucrats are non-productive entities. All they produce is paperwork. They need us because we are the only ones producing things. All others are parasites living off the sweat and blood of hard working people who harvest resources or produce something.


If we are all equal under God, when did they get the power to command us?  Government is stealing our livelihood by printing more money and dreaming up bureaucratic hoops for us to jump through so they can sell us a license to line their pockets with more money before we are allowed to work for a living. The constant inflation and enactment of millions of statutes and regulations is taking our children’s future. We can’t get married, drive a car, dig a ditch; or a hundred other things without first paying off some bureaucrat for a permit or license. The license fees are supposed to pay for insurance and other bogus reclamation plans. It was the loggers, fishermen, miners and factory workers that built this nation. Maybe it’s time to separate the wheat from the chaff. 

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Religious freedom Not! when you have to register.


You can't have religious freedom in the world when churches are required to register with the government.

Churches Are “Automatically Tax-Deductible”
And what about tax-deductibility? Doesn’t a church still need to become a 501c3 so that contributions to it can be taken as a tax deduction? The answer is no! According to IRS Publication 526: Organizations That Qualify To Receive Deductible Contributions
You can deduct your contributions only if you make them to a qualified organization. To become a qualified organization, most organizations other than churches and governments, as described below, must apply to the IRS.
In the IRS’ own words a church “is automatically tax-deductible.”


At the end of that article:
Churches Have a Mandatory Exception To Filing Tax Returns
Not only is it completely unnecessary for any church to seek 501c3 status, to do so becomes a grant of jurisdiction to the IRS by any church that obtains that State favor. In the words of Steve Nestor, IRS Sr. Revenue Officer (ret.):

"I am not the only IRS employee who’s wondered why churches go to the government and seek permission to be exempted from a tax they didn’t owe to begin with, and to seek a tax deductible status that they’ve always had anyway. Many of us have marveled at how church leaders want to be regulated and controlled by an agency of government that most Americans have prayed would just get out of their lives. Churches are in an amazingly unique position, but they don’t seem to know or appreciate the implications of what it would mean to be free of government control."
from the Forward of In Caesar's Grip, by Peter Kershaw

501c3 status
Most churches in America have organized as "501c3 tax-exempt religious organizations." This is a fairly recent trend that has only been going on for about fifty years. Churches were only added to section 501c3 of the tax code in 1954. We can thank Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson for that. Johnson was no ally of the church. As part of his political agenda, Johnson had it in mind to silence the church and eliminate the significant influence the church had always had on shaping "public policy."

Although Johnson proffered this as a "favor" to churches, the favor also came with strings attached (more like shackles). One need not look far to see the devastating effects 501c3 acceptance has had to the church, and the consequent restrictions placed upon any 501c3 church. 501c3 churches are prohibited from addressing, in any tangible way, the vital issues of the day.

For a 501c3 church to openly speak out, or organize in opposition to, anything that the government declares "legal," even if it is immoral (e.g. abortion, homosexuality, etc.), that church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a "chilling effect" upon the free speech rights of the church. LBJ was a shrewd and cunning politician who seemed to well-appreciate how easily many of the clergy would sell out.

Did the church ever need to seek permission from the government to be exempt from taxes? Were churches prior to 1954 taxable? No, churches have never been taxable. To be taxable a church would first need to be under the jurisdiction, and therefore under the taxing authority, of the government. The First Amendment clearly places the church outside the jurisdiction of the civil government: "Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Religion cannot be free if you have to pay the government, through taxation, to exercise it. Since churches aren't taxable in the first place, why do so many of them go to the IRS and seek permission to be tax-exempt? It occurs out of:

Ignorance ("We didn't know any better")
Bandwagon logic ("Everyone else is doing it")
Professional advice (many attorneys and CPAs recommend it)
Does the law require, or even encourage, a church to organize as a 501c3? To answer that question let's turn to what the IRS itself has to say.

Churches Need Not Apply

In order to be considered for tax-exempt status by the IRS an organization must fill out and submit IRS Form 1023 and 1024. However, note what the IRS says regarding churches and church ministries, in Publication 557:

Some organizations are not required to file Form 1023. These include:
Churches, interchurch organizations of local units of a church, conventions or associations of churches, or integrated auxiliaries of a church, such as a men’s or women’s organization, religious school, mission society, or youth group. These organizations are exempt automatically if they meet the requirements of section 501(c)(3).
Churches Are “Automatically Tax-Exempt”

According to IRS Code § 508(c)(1)(A):

Special rules with respect to section 501(c)(3) organizations.
(a) New organizations must notify secretary that they are applying for recognition of section 501(c)(3) status.
(c) Exceptions.
(1) Mandatory exceptions. Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to—
(A) churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches.
This is referred to as the "mandatory exception" rule. Thus, we see from the IRS’ own publications, and the tax code, that it is completely unnecessary for any church to apply for tax-exempt status. In the IRS’ own words a church “is automatically tax-exempt.”

Churches Are “Automatically Tax-Deductible”

And what about tax-deductibility? Doesn’t a church still need to become a 501c3 so that contributions to it can be taken as a tax deduction? The answer is no! According to IRS Publication 526:

Organizations That Qualify To Receive Deductible Contributions
You can deduct your contributions only if you make them to a qualified organization. To become a qualified organization, most organizations other than churches and governments, as described below, must apply to the IRS.
In the IRS’ own words a church “is automatically tax-deductible.”

Churches Have a Mandatory Exception To Filing Tax Returns

Not only is it completely unnecessary for any church to seek 501c3 status, to do so becomes a grant of jurisdiction to the IRS by any church that obtains that State favor. In the words of Steve Nestor, IRS Sr. Revenue Officer (ret.):

"I am not the only IRS employee who’s wondered why churches go to the government and seek permission to be exempted from a tax they didn’t owe to begin with, and to seek a tax deductible status that they’ve always had anyway. Many of us have marveled at how church leaders want to be regulated and controlled by an agency of government that most Americans have prayed would just get out of their lives. Churches are in an amazingly unique position, but they don’t seem to know or appreciate the implications of what it would mean to be free of government control."

from the Forward of In Caesar's Grip, by Peter Kershaw

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Noah's Ark forward to friends...


----- No words necessary!











































































Noah's Ark: Everything I need to know, I learned from Noah's Ark.
ONE: Don't miss the boat.
TWO: Remember that we are all in the same boat!
THREE: Plan ahead. It wasn't raining when Noah built the Ark .
FOUR: Stay fit. When you're 60 years old, someone may ask you to do something really big.
FIVE: Don't listen to critics; just get on with the job that needs to be done.
SIX: Build your future on high ground.
SEVEN: For safety's sake, travel in pairs.
EIGHT: Speed isn't always an advantage. The snails were on board with the cheetahs.
NINE: When you're stressed, float awhile.
TEN: Remember, the Ark was built by amateurs; the Titanic by professionals.
ELEVEN: No matter the storm, when you are with God, there's always a rainbow waiting.


Please pass this on to people you want to be blessed.
Give it! Don't just get it!

Most people walk in and out of your life,
but FRIENDS leave footprints in your heart.

Saturday, May 4, 2013

8-foot tall Giants-six fingers GOVERNMENT COVERUP


ARCHAEOLOGY NEWSFLASH 350
    Henry Kroll, this news is from Jonathan Gray -
    www.beforeus.com  You authorized this mailing when
    you requested your free report on our web-site. See
    below for removal directions.

Henry Kroll, you'll be astonished at this news which
Lisa has revealed.
A young New Zealander on a visit to the USA, Lisa
worked for a while with the New Mexico Parks
Department.
During her term of employment there was a big
"washout" in one of the Park regions and I'm
assuming it was up in Pueblo country around Taos.
The flash flood scoured out embankments and in doing
so a large number of anomalous skeletons were exposed.
Lisa and her colleagues were assigned the task of
gathering up the remains and placing them into crates.
Also in attendance at the site were Smithsonian Institute
officials and FBI agents.
Each day as Lisa and the other Parks Department
employees went onto the site, they were searched for
cameras. Similarly they were searched as they left the
site each day to make sure they weren't removing
artefacts.
They were also obliged to sign "secrecy documents"
ensuring that they would never divulge details of their
participation in this undertaking.
The reason for this degree of secrecy stems from the fact
that the skeletons were of people who were about 8 feet
tall. They had six fingers on each hand and six toes per
foot. They also had a strange, double row arrangement
of teeth.
The crates containing the recovered remains, at the
termination of work, were taken away by the
Smithsonian officials and, undoubtedly, will never be
seen again.
Lisa later had official "hassles" when trying to come
home to New Zealand and was severely grilled by United
States government functionaries as she attempted to depart
from the US.
THE FARMER WHO
NEARLY WENT TO PRISON

There are many ways to avoid having to face a challenge to
one’s theories.

This tactic would do any corrupt politician proud. I must
tell you about some stones that nearly sent a man to
prison.
In 1966, Dr Javier Cabrera, of Ica, Peru, was given a stone
by a poor local farmer.
You would not consider a stone to be much of a gift.
Perhaps this villager, just an average sort of man, did
not value it very highly either. But to the educated Dr
Cabrera it did mean a lot.
You see, a fish was carved on that stone – and Dr Cabrera
recognised it as a long-extinct species. This aroused his
curiosity.
So much so that he went looking for more such stones he
could purchase from the farmer. The village farmer explained
that he had collected the stones down near the river after
a flood.
Over time, Dr Cabrera accumulated more and more of these
strange, carved stones. In fact, it wasn’t long before he
had amassed thousands of them.
Eventually, word of these “Ica stones” and their potential
importance filtered out to the archaeological community.
The sophisticated carvings were as puzzling  as they were
fascinating. Some unknown person or persons had carved men
fighting with dinosaurs, men performing operations with
surgical equipment and men with telescopes.
A number of the stones were sent to Germany for examination.
And there the etchings were dated to remote antiquity.
But, of course, we all know, don’t we, that men could not
have lived at the same time as the dinosaurs?
Well, eventually the BBC heard of this discovery. It
wasn’t long before they swooped down to Peru – and the
result was a documentary about these strange Ica stones.
As might be expected, the media exposure ignited a storm
of controversy. Archaeologists criticised the government
of Peru for being lax in enforcing their antiquities
laws. (However, between you and me, that was not their
real concern.)
The next step was to apply pressure to government officials.
The villager who had been selling the stones to Dr Cabrera
was arrested.
To his interrogators he claimed to have found the stones
in a cave. However, according to the authorities he refused
to disclose the exact location to them.  
I tell you, so artfully was this case taken care of, that
it would be a great credit to any corrupt politician.
The Peruvian government now threatened to prosecute and
imprison the farmer. They offered him a plea bargain.
The frightened man accepted.  Then he recanted his story
and "admitted" that he had carved all of the stones himself.
Uneducated and unskilled as he was, he had “carved” all
11,000 of the stones!
Of course, you understand that some of these stones were
fairly large – not to mention that they were intricately
carved with animals and scenes that the poor farmer could
never had knowledge of, unless he was a palaeontologist.

And just think about this. Here was a poor man, who needed
to work hrad to earn a daily living to support his
dependents – yet, despite that, he would have needed to
spend every day for several decades and do nothing else,
just to produce this volume of carved stones.
Never mind, such underlying facts were neither here nor
there. The Ica stones were dubbed "hoax" and forgotten.
Handled this way, the case did not require any head-to-head
confrontation. There was no need for public discrediting of
non-scientists by scientists.
The whole matter was disposed of with invisible pressure
tactics.
Because it was filed away as a "hoax", the difficult
evidence of human co-existence with dinosaurs and of
ancient technological knowledge by the ancient carvers
never had to be dealt with. 
How convenient!
Anyway, some questions have been emailed in, which I am
pleased to share with you. Perhaps you have wondered on
these same matters yourself.
So here goes:
THOSE WHO DESTROY EVIDENCE
QUESTION:
Who are these people who suppress, discredit or destroy
historical evidences?, who benefit from it? I really want
to know your opinion - who and why?  Hristina.
ANSWER:
Using the Smithsonian Institution as an example, this was
founded by a gentleman whose aim was "the disemmination of
knowledge for the benefit of mankind." A most admirable
aim.

Not long after his death, however, at the time when
Darwin's evolutionary theory was starting to take hold,
the Smithsonian fell under the control of others, the
majority of whom were getting caught up in that theory and
desired to promote it.
Any evidence against it was first locked away, and then
denied. A conscious plan was set into action in which the
aim of the Smithsonian would be to educate the public in
the evolutionary mindset.
So it happened that the public displays in their museums
began to be arranged to illustrate this.
That same situation pertains to this day.
Theories which endangered that view included the ancient
relationship of the North American continent with the Old
World. So they fought strongly against anyone promoting
such a concept.
During a rasdio interview on Coast to Coast AM I happened
to mention that the Smithsonian Institute had taken a
boat-load of ancient artefacts out to sea and dumped them.
In a subsequent email to me, Franz von Riedel of the Zenith
Tugboat Company, Duluth, MN and Charleston, SC wrote:
"In case you're interested, I'm a tugboat captain (you can
Google my name and learn I'm legit... Ive literally 'written
the book' on tugboating!) and I can confirm that your mention
on Coast to Coast AM of artifact dumping is 100% correct. 
"For just under 3 years (during 2002 through 2005) I worked
out of the Philly Naval Yard as a sub-contractor, with a
low-level security clearance, on two projects - and I gained
1st-hand knowledge of this practice.  We sunk a tremendous
amount of materials for the U.S. Government. 
"I've not discussed this before, but you really inspired me
to not hold back anymore at all.  And, my job is different
now, and my security clearance expired January 24, 2008 anyway! 
"Email me if you are interested in specific details and I'll
dig up my old logs in storage and see what I wrote down.  I
keep detailed work logs, to make sure details are remembered
correctly.... I know I put what I learned in those logs.
They are here, at home, but just down in storage.  Not hard
to dig out." 
SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION
Meanwhile, another email writer, Raina, reports:
I retired early because I couldn't take the museum politics
and the lies. After leaving the Detroit museum and moving
to Florida taking over the Department of Archaeology and
(Director of Education) it was rough.
I decided rather then teach lies, I left the museum to
become a full time artist. Something I always loved. Now
at 61 I am a much happier person not having to deal with
the bureaucrats and all their shenanigans!  I now teach
in my home for the truth seekers.
MY COMMENT:
We take it for granted that the scientific Establishment
is run by men who are all clean and honest.
Let's face the truth, all of us! 
Most folk have no idea of the depth of corruption at the
top, nor of the extreme measures taken to block the truth.
To answer your question, the mainstream scientific world is
currently in the grip of powerful men with enormous money
behind them – and an agenda. They have much to lose if they
fail.
And they have had a good run of success. Constant exposure
to something, in most cases, leads to its acceptance. As
Hitler acknowledged, “Tell a lie long enough and people
will come to believe it.”

As a result, many honest scientists are caught up in the
system – and sincerely misinformed. The evolution theory
was all they were taught.
As a result, most university graduates have acquired their
degrees through this system.
But here is the problem. As new scientific discovery brings
a mounting mass of evidence against it, scientists who
question the status quo risk losing their positions in the
universities. They fear for their reputations and loss of
grants to do research if they speak up against it.
Many who have renounced the theory of evolution have not
only lost funding for their projects, they have also been
misrepresented, ridiculed  and fired. And much of their
research has then been destroyed. Examples of such treatment
could fill volumes.

And here’s something else to consider. It is almost
impossible for a person who has taken a public stance on
a certain position, to make a public admission that what he
has taught is wrong.
So many educators continue with the tide. Shame on them!

Therefore the unsuspecting public continues to be fed this
hoax. And a compliant media regurgitates it as though
nothing was wrong.

But we can help change that.
WHY DO ACADEMIC SECRECY
AND COVER-UPS PERSIST? 
QUESTION:
Shirley wrote in, "I will never understand why all the secrecy
and denial that all these things exist, what do you think?"
ANSWER:
To set the record straight, an increasing number of scientists
are now standing for the truth.
But Shattered myths still dominate the universities, schools
and textbooks we learn from.
Here's an example of how a discredited theory can persiast.


Do you know that up to 200 years after the flat earth theory
was disproved, schools in Europe were still teaching it as
fact?
Entrenched theories do die hard. It takes time. And the
discoveries I keep sharing with you do challenge the
entrenched evolution theory.
IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE
BEHIND THE DENIALS?
QUESTION:
Chuck, an American guy, had this to say:
Why are so many scientists and media members so against
the abundant evidence of past advanced civilizations?  Why
is this such a horrible thing?  When anyone writes of this,
I've seen many times where they will call the writer "foolish"
or "unqualified", but never once have I seen them debate the
facts the writer presents.  Just make an attack on the
person, never discuss the facts presented, and move on.
Yes, I know reputations can be at stake, and scientists do
not like to admit being wrong, but is there something more
to this? 
ANSWER:
Are you sitting down? The underlying reason why many
reject the evidence is because the sacred evolution theory
demands it.
Believe it. This is a battle between two “religions”

Did it ever occur to you that evolution theory is really a
religion?
Let me explain.




When Darwin offered his “Origin of Species” theory, the reason
that many gladly embraced it was because it offered an
alternative to “God.”  They wanted God out!  Out of their
lives, out of their memories. 
Why? Largely because a hypocritical Church had turned them off.
Darwin’s evolution theory gave them an “out.”



You see, evolution makes definite statements about God.  It
states that
     1. we have destiny in our own hands,
     2. that the Creator plays no part in the processes
        around us;
     3. that we shall never answer to any Higher Being. 
Those are religious claims. Evolution, you see, is an
atheistic religious belief – a religion and a philosophy.

Indeed, here is an evolutionary scientist admitting this:
“In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion;
almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared
to ‘bend’ their observations to fit in with it.”  (H.S.
Lipson, Professor of Physics, University of Manchester, “A
Physicist Looks at Evolution”, Physics Bulletin, vol.31)



The major issues at stake are at long last being clarified by
evolutionist leaders themselves – the DELIBERATE CHOICE of not
wanting to invoke the Creator.
Dr. Michael Walker, Senior Lecturer in Anthropology, Sydney
University,agrees:
“One is forced to conclude that many scientists and
technologists pay lip-service to Darwinian theory only because
it supposedly excludes a Creator.”  (Michael Walker, Senior
Lecturer in Anthropology, Sydney University, Quadrant, October,
1981, p.44)

Like it or not, evolution is not “just another” scientific
theory.  Evolution is really a faith and heart commitment,
a complete world-and-life view;  in other words, a religion.






You see, evolutionary scientists dismiss many alternative views
(for example a Global Flood and superior ancient civilizations)
for religious reasons… and not on objective reasons based on
geological or ancient historical data.

Often, their furious rejection of any theories involving the
supernatural seems almost pathological.

WHY DO GOVERNMENTS
COVER UP FINDS?
QUESTION:
"What about governments?" writes Joshua. "Is there any kind of
reason why governments around the world would cover up 'giant
human remains' and maybe terminate those who know about them
or have them?"
ANSWER:
Governments are influenced by pressure groups. Today, I see
evidence of at least two powerful groups at work:
     (1) Indigenous peoples who are making land claims based
         on the belief that they were the first here - which
         they were not (and these ancient finds prove that)
     (2) Philosophical globalist power players with loads of
         money who are in control of the state education system
         (which includes the media). Their philosophy
         - the evolution theory - is jealously defended to the
         point of a religious fanatism, despite the growing
         evidence against it.

Despite their attempts to destroy this information, my book of
a thousand ancient wonders (Dead Men's Secrets) has become one
of the best sellers.
In fact,it's one of the most powerful tools you can use to
astonish your friends and family... and just watch their
astonishment.
Here is where to claim your copy:
http://www.beforeus.com
Meanwhile, I wish you and yours a great week ahead.
Until next time,
Jonathan Gray
PS. A little girl asked her mother, “How did the human race
appear?” The mother answered, “God made Adam and Eve, they had
children: and so all mankind was made.”
Two days later the girl asked her father the same question. The
father answered, “Many years ago there were monkeys from which
the human race evolved.”
The confused girl returned to her mother and said, “Mum, how is
it possible that you told me the human race was created by God
and Dad said they developed from monkeys?”
The mother answered, “Well, Dear, it is very simple. I told you
about my side of the family and your father told you about his.”
   
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
   
Please email me your questions. I am here to help
you with any questions on ancient mysteries. Just
email me at info@archaeologyanswers.com
---------------------------------------------
PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS
---------------------------------------------
   
Did you enjoy this information?
   
If you know someone who would find these facts
interesting, Click the URL below now to email it to
them, or copy and paste the URL below into your
browser.
http://www.beforeus.com
You are welcome to put it on your own website
exactly as it is, without change, including our email
address.
======================================================
International explorer, archaeologist and author
Jonathan Gray has traveled the world to gather data
on ancient mysteries. He has penetrated some largely
unexplored areas, including parts of the Amazon
headwaters. The author has also led expeditions to
the bottom of the sea and to remote mountain and
desert regions of the world. He lectures internationally.
======================================================
  
If you have received this mailing in error, or do not
wish to receive any further newsletter mailings from
us, simply click "Reply" and type IN THE SUBJECT
LINE "unsubscribe".
Or write to
Surprising Discoveries
Pacific Coast Highway
PO Box 785
Thames 3540
New Zeala

8-foot tall Giants, six fingers, GOVERNMENT COVERUP


ARCHAEOLOGY NEWSFLASH 350
    Henry Kroll, this news is from Jonathan Gray -
    www.beforeus.com  You authorized this mailing when
    you requested your free report on our web-site. See
    below for removal directions.

Henry Kroll, you'll be astonished at this news which
Lisa has revealed.
A young New Zealander on a visit to the USA, Lisa
worked for a while with the New Mexico Parks
Department.
During her term of employment there was a big
"washout" in one of the Park regions and I'm
assuming it was up in Pueblo country around Taos.
The flash flood scoured out embankments and in doing
so a large number of anomalous skeletons were exposed.
Lisa and her colleagues were assigned the task of
gathering up the remains and placing them into crates.
Also in attendance at the site were Smithsonian Institute
officials and FBI agents.
Each day as Lisa and the other Parks Department
employees went onto the site, they were searched for
cameras. Similarly they were searched as they left the
site each day to make sure they weren't removing
artefacts.
They were also obliged to sign "secrecy documents"
ensuring that they would never divulge details of their
participation in this undertaking.
The reason for this degree of secrecy stems from the fact
that the skeletons were of people who were about 8 feet
tall. They had six fingers on each hand and six toes per
foot. They also had a strange, double row arrangement
of teeth.
The crates containing the recovered remains, at the
termination of work, were taken away by the
Smithsonian officials and, undoubtedly, will never be
seen again.
Lisa later had official "hassles" when trying to come
home to New Zealand and was severely grilled by United
States government functionaries as she attempted to depart
from the US.
THE FARMER WHO
NEARLY WENT TO PRISON

There are many ways to avoid having to face a challenge to
one’s theories.

This tactic would do any corrupt politician proud. I must
tell you about some stones that nearly sent a man to
prison.
In 1966, Dr Javier Cabrera, of Ica, Peru, was given a stone
by a poor local farmer.
You would not consider a stone to be much of a gift.
Perhaps this villager, just an average sort of man, did
not value it very highly either. But to the educated Dr
Cabrera it did mean a lot.
You see, a fish was carved on that stone – and Dr Cabrera
recognised it as a long-extinct species. This aroused his
curiosity.
So much so that he went looking for more such stones he
could purchase from the farmer. The village farmer explained
that he had collected the stones down near the river after
a flood.
Over time, Dr Cabrera accumulated more and more of these
strange, carved stones. In fact, it wasn’t long before he
had amassed thousands of them.
Eventually, word of these “Ica stones” and their potential
importance filtered out to the archaeological community.
The sophisticated carvings were as puzzling  as they were
fascinating. Some unknown person or persons had carved men
fighting with dinosaurs, men performing operations with
surgical equipment and men with telescopes.
A number of the stones were sent to Germany for examination.
And there the etchings were dated to remote antiquity.
But, of course, we all know, don’t we, that men could not
have lived at the same time as the dinosaurs?
Well, eventually the BBC heard of this discovery. It
wasn’t long before they swooped down to Peru – and the
result was a documentary about these strange Ica stones.
As might be expected, the media exposure ignited a storm
of controversy. Archaeologists criticised the government
of Peru for being lax in enforcing their antiquities
laws. (However, between you and me, that was not their
real concern.)
The next step was to apply pressure to government officials.
The villager who had been selling the stones to Dr Cabrera
was arrested.
To his interrogators he claimed to have found the stones
in a cave. However, according to the authorities he refused
to disclose the exact location to them.  
I tell you, so artfully was this case taken care of, that
it would be a great credit to any corrupt politician.
The Peruvian government now threatened to prosecute and
imprison the farmer. They offered him a plea bargain.
The frightened man accepted.  Then he recanted his story
and "admitted" that he had carved all of the stones himself.
Uneducated and unskilled as he was, he had “carved” all
11,000 of the stones!
Of course, you understand that some of these stones were
fairly large – not to mention that they were intricately
carved with animals and scenes that the poor farmer could
never had knowledge of, unless he was a palaeontologist.

And just think about this. Here was a poor man, who needed
to work hrad to earn a daily living to support his
dependents – yet, despite that, he would have needed to
spend every day for several decades and do nothing else,
just to produce this volume of carved stones.
Never mind, such underlying facts were neither here nor
there. The Ica stones were dubbed "hoax" and forgotten.
Handled this way, the case did not require any head-to-head
confrontation. There was no need for public discrediting of
non-scientists by scientists.
The whole matter was disposed of with invisible pressure
tactics.
Because it was filed away as a "hoax", the difficult
evidence of human co-existence with dinosaurs and of
ancient technological knowledge by the ancient carvers
never had to be dealt with. 
How convenient!
Anyway, some questions have been emailed in, which I am
pleased to share with you. Perhaps you have wondered on
these same matters yourself.
So here goes:
THOSE WHO DESTROY EVIDENCE
QUESTION:
Who are these people who suppress, discredit or destroy
historical evidences?, who benefit from it? I really want
to know your opinion - who and why?  Hristina.
ANSWER:
Using the Smithsonian Institution as an example, this was
founded by a gentleman whose aim was "the disemmination of
knowledge for the benefit of mankind." A most admirable
aim.

Not long after his death, however, at the time when
Darwin's evolutionary theory was starting to take hold,
the Smithsonian fell under the control of others, the
majority of whom were getting caught up in that theory and
desired to promote it.
Any evidence against it was first locked away, and then
denied. A conscious plan was set into action in which the
aim of the Smithsonian would be to educate the public in
the evolutionary mindset.
So it happened that the public displays in their museums
began to be arranged to illustrate this.
That same situation pertains to this day.
Theories which endangered that view included the ancient
relationship of the North American continent with the Old
World. So they fought strongly against anyone promoting
such a concept.
During a rasdio interview on Coast to Coast AM I happened
to mention that the Smithsonian Institute had taken a
boat-load of ancient artefacts out to sea and dumped them.
In a subsequent email to me, Franz von Riedel of the Zenith
Tugboat Company, Duluth, MN and Charleston, SC wrote:
"In case you're interested, I'm a tugboat captain (you can
Google my name and learn I'm legit... Ive literally 'written
the book' on tugboating!) and I can confirm that your mention
on Coast to Coast AM of artifact dumping is 100% correct. 
"For just under 3 years (during 2002 through 2005) I worked
out of the Philly Naval Yard as a sub-contractor, with a
low-level security clearance, on two projects - and I gained
1st-hand knowledge of this practice.  We sunk a tremendous
amount of materials for the U.S. Government. 
"I've not discussed this before, but you really inspired me
to not hold back anymore at all.  And, my job is different
now, and my security clearance expired January 24, 2008 anyway! 
"Email me if you are interested in specific details and I'll
dig up my old logs in storage and see what I wrote down.  I
keep detailed work logs, to make sure details are remembered
correctly.... I know I put what I learned in those logs. 
They are here, at home, but just down in storage.  Not hard
to dig out." 
SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION
Meanwhile, another email writer, Raina, reports:
I retired early because I couldn't take the museum politics
and the lies. After leaving the Detroit museum and moving
to Florida taking over the Department of Archaeology and
(Director of Education) it was rough.
I decided rather then teach lies, I left the museum to
become a full time artist. Something I always loved. Now
at 61 I am a much happier person not having to deal with
the bureaucrats and all their shenanigans!  I now teach
in my home for the truth seekers.
MY COMMENT:
We take it for granted that the scientific Establishment
is run by men who are all clean and honest.
Let's face the truth, all of us! 
Most folk have no idea of the depth of corruption at the
top, nor of the extreme measures taken to block the truth.
To answer your question, the mainstream scientific world is
currently in the grip of powerful men with enormous money
behind them – and an agenda. They have much to lose if they
fail.
And they have had a good run of success. Constant exposure
to something, in most cases, leads to its acceptance. As
Hitler acknowledged, “Tell a lie long enough and people
will come to believe it.”

As a result, many honest scientists are caught up in the
system – and sincerely misinformed. The evolution theory
was all they were taught.
As a result, most university graduates have acquired their
degrees through this system.
But here is the problem. As new scientific discovery brings
a mounting mass of evidence against it, scientists who
question the status quo risk losing their positions in the
universities. They fear for their reputations and loss of
grants to do research if they speak up against it.
Many who have renounced the theory of evolution have not
only lost funding for their projects, they have also been
misrepresented, ridiculed  and fired. And much of their
research has then been destroyed. Examples of such treatment
could fill volumes.

And here’s something else to consider. It is almost
impossible for a person who has taken a public stance on
a certain position, to make a public admission that what he
has taught is wrong.
So many educators continue with the tide. Shame on them!

Therefore the unsuspecting public continues to be fed this
hoax. And a compliant media regurgitates it as though
nothing was wrong. 

But we can help change that.
WHY DO ACADEMIC SECRECY
AND COVER-UPS PERSIST? 
QUESTION:
Shirley wrote in, "I will never understand why all the secrecy
and denial that all these things exist, what do you think?"
ANSWER:
To set the record straight, an increasing number of scientists
are now standing for the truth.
But Shattered myths still dominate the universities, schools
and textbooks we learn from.
Here's an example of how a discredited theory can persiast.

Do you know that up to 200 years after the flat earth theory
was disproved, schools in Europe were still teaching it as
fact?
Entrenched theories do die hard. It takes time. And the
discoveries I keep sharing with you do challenge the
entrenched evolution theory.
IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE
BEHIND THE DENIALS?
QUESTION:
Chuck, an American guy, had this to say:
Why are so many scientists and media members so against
the abundant evidence of past advanced civilizations?  Why
is this such a horrible thing?  When anyone writes of this,
I've seen many times where they will call the writer "foolish"
or "unqualified", but never once have I seen them debate the
facts the writer presents.  Just make an attack on the
person, never discuss the facts presented, and move on. 
Yes, I know reputations can be at stake, and scientists do
not like to admit being wrong, but is there something more
to this? 
ANSWER:
Are you sitting down? The underlying reason why many 
reject the evidence is because the sacred evolution theory
demands it.
Believe it. This is a battle between two “religions”

Did it ever occur to you that evolution theory is really a
religion?
Let me explain.

When Darwin offered his “Origin of Species” theory, the reason
that many gladly embraced it was because it offered an
alternative to “God.”  They wanted God out!  Out of their
lives, out of their memories. 
Why? Largely because a hypocritical Church had turned them off. 
Darwin’s evolution theory gave them an “out.”

You see, evolution makes definite statements about God.  It
states that
     1. we have destiny in our own hands,
     2. that the Creator plays no part in the processes
        around us;
     3. that we shall never answer to any Higher Being. 
Those are religious claims. Evolution, you see, is an
atheistic religious belief – a religion and a philosophy.

Indeed, here is an evolutionary scientist admitting this:
“In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; 
almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared
to ‘bend’ their observations to fit in with it.”  (H.S.
Lipson, Professor of Physics, University of Manchester, “A
Physicist Looks at Evolution”, Physics Bulletin, vol.31) 

The major issues at stake are at long last being clarified by
evolutionist leaders themselves – the DELIBERATE CHOICE of not
wanting to invoke the Creator.
Dr. Michael Walker, Senior Lecturer in Anthropology, Sydney
University,agrees:
“One is forced to conclude that many scientists and
technologists pay lip-service to Darwinian theory only because
it supposedly excludes a Creator.”  (Michael Walker, Senior
Lecturer in Anthropology, Sydney University, Quadrant, October,
1981, p.44)

Like it or not, evolution is not “just another” scientific
theory.  Evolution is really a faith and heart commitment,
a complete world-and-life view;  in other words, a religion.

You see, evolutionary scientists dismiss many alternative views
(for example a Global Flood and superior ancient civilizations)
for religious reasons… and not on objective reasons based on
geological or ancient historical data.

Often, their furious rejection of any theories involving the
supernatural seems almost pathological.

WHY DO GOVERNMENTS
COVER UP FINDS?
QUESTION:
"What about governments?" writes Joshua. "Is there any kind of
reason why governments around the world would cover up 'giant
human remains' and maybe terminate those who know about them
or have them?"
ANSWER:
Governments are influenced by pressure groups. Today, I see
evidence of at least two powerful groups at work:
     (1) Indigenous peoples who are making land claims based
         on the belief that they were the first here - which
         they were not (and these ancient finds prove that)
     (2) Philosophical globalist power players with loads of
         money who are in control of the state education system
         (which includes the media). Their philosophy
         - the evolution theory - is jealously defended to the
         point of a religious fanatism, despite the growing
         evidence against it.

Despite their attempts to destroy this information, my book of
a thousand ancient wonders (Dead Men's Secrets) has become one
of the best sellers.
In fact,it's one of the most powerful tools you can use to 
astonish your friends and family... and just watch their
astonishment.
Here is where to claim your copy:
http://www.beforeus.com
Meanwhile, I wish you and yours a great week ahead.
Until next time,
Jonathan Gray
PS. A little girl asked her mother, “How did the human race
appear?” The mother answered, “God made Adam and Eve, they had
children: and so all mankind was made.”
Two days later the girl asked her father the same question. The
father answered, “Many years ago there were monkeys from which
the human race evolved.”
The confused girl returned to her mother and said, “Mum, how is
it possible that you told me the human race was created by God
and Dad said they developed from monkeys?”
The mother answered, “Well, Dear, it is very simple. I told you
about my side of the family and your father told you about his.”
      
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
      
Please email me your questions. I am here to help
you with any questions on ancient mysteries. Just
email me at info@archaeologyanswers.com
---------------------------------------------
PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS
---------------------------------------------
      
Did you enjoy this information?
      
If you know someone who would find these facts
interesting, Click the URL below now to email it to
them, or copy and paste the URL below into your
browser.
http://www.beforeus.com
You are welcome to put it on your own website
exactly as it is, without change, including our email
address.
======================================================
International explorer, archaeologist and author
Jonathan Gray has traveled the world to gather data
on ancient mysteries. He has penetrated some largely
unexplored areas, including parts of the Amazon
headwaters. The author has also led expeditions to
the bottom of the sea and to remote mountain and
desert regions of the world. He lectures internationally.
======================================================
     
If you have received this mailing in error, or do not
wish to receive any further newsletter mailings from
us, simply click "Reply" and type IN THE SUBJECT
LINE "unsubscribe".
Or write to
Surprising Discoveries
Pacific Coast Highway
PO Box 785
Thames 3540
New Zeala